Precambrian pollen

Steven Schimmrich (schimmrich@earthlink.net)
Sat, 22 Aug 1998 10:36:08 -0400

Pim van Meurs wrote, in reply to Glenn Morton, that:

>> Art Chadwick, a believer in a Global flood, tried to repeat Burdick's
>> experiment. He took all sorts of precautions against contamination. He
>> found NO pollen. He wrote:
>
> Good to see that lack of repeatability led to the failing of the
> hypothesis.

The guilty parties still stubbornly cling to their hypothesis that
they found modern pollen within Precambrian shales. I wrote a little
about it at:

http://home.earthlink.net/~schimmrich/essays/hakatai.html

The reason I've generally stayed away from arguing against the YEC
viewpoint on this forum (Evolution) is because it's been my experience
that their views are never critically examined, even when confronted with
very strong evidence to the contrary and even when it's documented that
some of them are misrepresenting evidence. It's a complete waste of time.

- Steve (feeling cynical today).

--   Steven H. Schimmrich				Assistant professor of geology   Department of Geology and Geography		sschimmr@calvin.edu   Calvin College				schimmri@earthlink.net (home)   3201 Burton Street SE			616-957-7053, 616-957-6501 (fax)   Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546			http://home.earthlink.net/~schimmrich/