RE: lungs
Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Fri, 14 Aug 1998 08:52:39 -0700Stephen: If we fall in with the naturalists trick of defining evolution so broadly that it cannot be false and creation so narrowly that it cannot be true, as in the following science dictionaries,
then we have lost almost before we start. All the naturalist has to show is *some* change over time in *one species* and "evolution" has won and "creation" (defined as "special creation") has lost!>>
You surely make some poor strawman arguments. arguments. Perhaps you should try to focus on arguments that are not based upon a careful selection of 'science dictionaries' and more on what 'naturalists' really say and believe ?