If you will set aside the time to carry out a thorough examination of my
evidence and claims, then I will carefully examine the facts that have
led to the construction of the 'geological column' - which, I believe,
is still being offered as evidence for evolution.>>
The geological collumn is just one of the many evidences supporting evolution and was first put together by people trying to show that it did not support evolution. Now as far as your suggestion goes, I am wondering why you expect me to do your work ? 1) You have failed to show that the features you found indicate a Divinity and not just chance or a biased interpretation. For instance with the triangle which you consider the sign of the Trinity, there is no indication that this was a predicted feature. You are interpreting findings after the fact, without showing any reason why this reveals Divinity and not just chance or biased interpretation or human authorship ?
Vernon: I look forward to hearing that you will agree to this proposal. If so,
I'm sure that we shall both end up a little wiser in the ways of God and
of the world, and any future exchanges might then be more fruitful.>>
I don't think that the geological collumn, nor your data will bring us much closer to the ways of God. God is based on faith. Heck for all I know, trying to build an image of God as you are trying to do in the numerology could be a violation of one of his commandments. For all I know, these features were planted there by the devil just for this purpose.
Who really knows, as you said others were misguided before you in their interpretations. My question to you is, what makes you different ?