RE: The Other Bible Code

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Sun, 26 Jul 1998 05:39:04 -0700

Pim van Meurs wrote:
>
> I found the following posting about numerology which explains further my reservations to this
topic. In order to show a 'divine' contribution, one has to establish that the patterns could not be caused by 1) chance 2) by the experimentor.
>
Vernon:
Thank you for this contribution. I am aware that many before me have, in
their enthusiasm to uphold the Word of God, made ill-informed and
extravagant claims - and a number still do, as you have pointed out.>>

So what makes you believe that you are different ? All the 'others' surely felt the same as you do.

Vernon:
With respect, until you absorb the miraculous circumstances attending my findings, you will fail to see that they are of a different genre from those you quote, and are not so readily refuted.>>

What I see is someone who might hold the same ill-informed claims as those who have gone before him ? How can you be sure ? You have done little to show that your 'miracles' are different from the other 'miracles' which you consider rightly ill-informed claims.