No it isn't. Anatomy has nothing to do with it. This is just another
example of someone presupposing macroevolution to begin with and drawing
conclusions based on that mindset. To quote Behe in DARWIN'S BLACK BOX,
pp.22 "Thus biochemistry offers a Lilliputian challenge to Darwin.
Anatomy is, quite simply, irrelevant to the question of whether evolution
could take place on the molecular level. So is the fossil record. It no
longer matters whether there are huge gaps in the fossil record of whether
the record is as continuous as that of U.S. Presidents."
Ye shall know the Truth, and the Truth
shall make you free. John 8:32
Ron Chitwood
chitw@flash.net
----------
> From: Glenn R. Morton <grmorton@waymark.net>
> To: evolution@calvin.edu
> Subject: New transitional fossil
> Date: Thursday, July 02, 1998 6:13 AM
>
> This morning on the AP wire is a report of the discovery of a creature
> which is transitional between two groups of modern tetrapods
> (mammals/lizards/birds/turtles) and (frogs/salamanders). This 333 myr
old
> fossil is transtional between the two groups ie. shows traits from both
> groups. The creature is named
>
> eucritta melanolimneties which means 'true creature from the black
lagoon'.
>
> This is a bit difficult to get to here is how I do it. Goto
>
> http://www.star-telegram.com/comm/med/index.htm
>
> Then choose "Medical and Science News"
>
> then choose 'sci' from the little tab at the top of the screen
>
> Then choose 'Scientist find Lagoon fossil"
> glenn
>
> Adam, Apes and Anthropology
> Foundation, Fall and Flood
> & lots of creation/evolution information
> http://www.isource.net/~grmorton/dmd.htm