Seems the problem, Glenn, is on your end, not his.
1. He claims something is meant in jest.
2. You don't "see the humor."
3. You therefore treat it as a solid (erroneous) argument.
4. That does not make sense to me.
Maybe Johnson's humor IS "strained" in this case.
So what?
As long as HE claims it is in jest, how can you insist he means it
otherwise?
Burgy
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]