It's been a long time since this has been written and it was written by
humans, maybe the text is corrupted. humans allow for human error. or
maybe they didn't know and made a lot of assumptions and repeated
"popular knowledge"
so, why is it that no one will even consider these arguments, even
though i see someone on this list has mentioned them.
jason
>2. The text is corrupted
>3. Luke just repeated "popular knowledge"
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com