Since we are speculating and trying to place our minds inside God why, from
your viewpoint, would it make any difference for time to be a factor? It
would be more 'efficient', by the way, for God to create immediately to
begin with rather than ooze through the slow, inefficient,
macroevolutionary, hit-or-miss process you apparently think HE did,
wouldn't it?
Trust in the LORD with all your heart,
and do not rely on your own insight.. Pr. 3:5
Ron Chitwood
chitw@flash.net
----------
> From: Glenn R. Morton <grmorton@waymark.net>
> To: Ron Chitwood <chitw@flash.net>; John E. Rylander
<rylander@prolexia.com>; Calvin Evolution Reflector <evolution@calvin.edu>
> Subject: Re: evolution-digest V1 #930
> Date: Wednesday, May 27, 1998 7:42 PM
>
> At 04:46 PM 5/26/98 -0500, Ron Chitwood wrote:
> >>>>Let the LAND produce animals after their kind." Entirely different
> >meaning. REad the sentence!<<<
> >
> >This makes me wonder why God had the animals enter the ark, both male
and
> >female. HE could have let the 'land' take care of the animal population
> >problem.
>
> Because evolution takes a long time and it is more efficient to save the
> animals the LAND had already brought forth! What is so difficult about
that?
> glenn
>
> Adam, Apes and Anthropology
> Foundation, Fall and Flood
> & lots of creation/evolution information
> http://www.isource.net/~grmorton/dmd.htm