Re: Glenn wrote:

Ron Chitwood (chitw@flash.net)
Fri, 29 May 1998 01:55:19 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ron Chitwood: "Re: Glenn wrote:"
Previous message: Glenn R. Morton: "Jinmium overturned."
Maybe in reply to: John W. Burgeson: "Glenn wrote:"
Next in thread: Ron Chitwood: "Re: Glenn wrote:"

>>>>It depends upon whether or not the curators believed the new data. Not
every new thing is true (unless you are willing to accede the truth of
evolution because it is a newly reported scientific view). If they believed
that Neanderthal walked like us and they didn't change them, then yes I
would agree it was fraud. But I can't get into their heads so I will give
them the benefit of the doubt.<<<<

How about the recapitulation theory. Do you agree that it is still taught
in some rudimentary science textbooks? If so, does that constitute fraud
by some current scientific academia?

Trust in the LORD with all your heart,
and do not rely on your own insight.. Pr. 3:5
Ron Chitwood
chitw@flash.net

----------
>

Next message: Ron Chitwood: "Re: Glenn wrote:"
Previous message: Glenn R. Morton: "Jinmium overturned."
Maybe in reply to: John W. Burgeson: "Glenn wrote:"
Next in thread: Ron Chitwood: "Re: Glenn wrote:"