Stated differently, evolution only attempts to explain how complex forms
came into being. Evolution does not concern itself with metaphysical
questions of design.
At 09:32 PM 4/7/98 -0500, you wrote:
>I was just sitting here thinking, rare as the occasion is, and I came upon
>something that I thought I would share with you all.
>
>Science has this wonderful way of looking at things and distinguishing
>between the natural and the made. For example when an archeologist
>stumbles upon a rock he/she will go examine the rock in several ways and
>determine if the rock is just a plain old rock, or if it is an artifact of
>a distant civilization. Many times the conclusion is based on the fact
>that the rock has complexity that cannot be attributed to nature, this
>leads the archeologist to conclude that the rock was made by an intellegent
>person.
>
>I find it very odd that, while it is so evident to these scientists that
>the rock had a maker, they look at living things and basically attribute
>all of living nature to chance. The complexity of nature far excedes that
>of the rock on the ground yet this complexity came about by chance. This
>is one of the things that keeps me from embracing the theory of evolution
>in its entirety.
>
>Well I just thought that I would share that.
>
>Best Regards,
>
>J.D. Guzman
>
>
_________________________________________________________
Steven S. Clark, Ph.D . Phone: 608/263-9137
Associate Professor FAX: 608/263-4226
Dept. of Human Oncology and Email: ssclark@facstaff.wisc.edu
UW Comprehensive Cancer Center
CSC K4-432
600 Highland Ave.
Madison, WI 53792
"It is the glory of God to conceal a matter, but the glory of kings to
search out a matter." Proverbs
________________________________________________________