>Both Glenn and Stephen postulate against models of natural science and
>evolution that are not mainstream science or rational constructs thereof.
Considering that I am an evolutionist, I wonder if you really read anything
I write:
>BTW: I did check the archves and the citations and Glenn wasn't telling
>the truth in his dispute with Trivers. In addition, two of Glenn's
>citations with regard to the "Eve Hypothesis" were bogus. I am not as
>qualified to comment on whether any were out of context..
>
Then please tell me which ones. Trivers would make this charge without any
specifics and now you do it. Please tell me the specific cases. If I am
wrong I will thank you for correcting me.
glenn
Adam, Apes, and Anthropology: Finding the Soul of Fossil Man
and
Foundation, Fall and Flood
http://www.isource.net/~grmorton/dmd.htm