Yes Jim, there are numbers. But the numbers that are there do not solve the
problem posed by my question about the heat problem. Merely having numbers
is no guarantee that they prove what you suggest.
along with "snapshots" of computer modeling and
>nineteen references to specialized literature, including an article by a
>guy named G. R. Morton, entitled, "The Flood on an Expanding Earth,"
>Creation Research Society Quarterly, 19 (1983), pp. 219-224!! (Baumgardner
>cites this example only to point out there are serious difficulties with
>it, along with other proposed solutions, and then he proposes his
>alternative.)
A little bit of background. When I first came in contact with John, he and
I agreed on earth expansion. He gave it up first, then I gave it up. I gave
it up because there are as many serious problems with it as there are with
Baumgardners present view.
>
> Anyway, Baumgardner is not hiding anything as far as I can see.
That is the key, as far as you can see. I admit that I am not a speciallist
in the numerical methods he uses, but I do know enough to know that there
are serious problems.
>True, it takes a specialist to crunch the numbers, but at least they are
>out there. Here is the abstract:
Once again Jim, having numbers doesn't prove a thing unless the numbers
solve the problem. They don't. And I stand by what I said.
glenn
Adam, Apes, and Anthropology: Finding the Soul of Fossil Man
and
Foundation, Fall and Flood
http://www.isource.net/~grmorton/dmd.htm