KK> Did your friend mention that the Frenchman was aware of the
fact that he was being observed? If he hadn't jumped into the lake
would he of been judged for *not* doing so? Did he have time to
think to himself, "Ah it's just that American Art and his
sociobiologist friend. I'll never see them again. No matter let the
girls take care of themselves." Could we also assume that the girls
would be appreciative? He was French was he not? (<-- That was
a joke. Just kidding.) Was he enrolled in one of your classes? ; -)
(<-- Another joke.)
AC> Was Christ's "sacrifice" on the cross altruistic? Not
according to sociobiological standards. Where do you draw the
line? I see altruism. My sociobiological friend sees self
preservation. Who is right? I wouldn't trade places with him for
anything. If there is no altruism, there is no reason to live. Self
preservation will never hack it as a motive for living forever.
KK>No jokes here. I'm not prepared to answer the question about
Christ's sacrifice. I will ask this in response. How does self
preservation effect altruism negatively? As long as the human
race regards altruism as a positive trait it will be selected against
selfishness. You still have a reason to live and it's a good one.
We should hold people who exhibit altruism with high regard. As a
Christian I do and I also now that if I succeed I will be *rewarded*
will everlasting life.
Respectfully yours,
Kevin