Re: Doubts over spectacular Jinmium dates

Glenn Morton (grmorton@waymark.net)
Sun, 08 Feb 1998 17:19:00 -0600

At 10:53 PM 2/8/98 +0800, Stephen Jones wrote:

>SJ>I tire of dealing with this stuff and because of a weariness of answering
>>your constant accusations

>
>What "accusations", Glenn?
>
Like the ones below. You are the only person that I discuss things with
where we seem to degenerate to this type of conversation.

>SJ>You say things like the above with no evidence whatsoever. I didn't remove
>>anything from my web page. The list you refer to was put on my web page on
>>the day in question. Prior to that day, the list of human technology was
>>not there at all. At the time I placed that on the page, Jinmium was NOT on
>>the list. Now I see no point to your silly unsubstantiated claim.
>
>If the list did not include anything about Jinmium, then why did you talk
>about removing it from your list if the outcome was that the thermoluminescence
>dates fail:

I am going to answer this and then not deal with your posts anymore. This
is a silly type of discussion to have on an evolution list.

I said I would remove them because when I wrote that I thought it was on the
list. When I pulled up the list, it wasn't there and I was surprised. I
then placed the list on my web page. Now, Jinmium is in my book and if
jinmium is discredited I will remove it.

There Stephen. I hope this is the last time we have to play games like this
silliness. I don't find this to be a good use of my time. So if anyone
sees something in Stephen's posts that they want a response from me, then
please call my attention to it. Otherwise I probably won't know about it. I
fully intend never to engage in this type of gamesmanship again.

glenn

Adam, Apes, and Anthropology: Finding the Soul of Fossil Man

and

Foundation, Fall and Flood
http://www.isource.net/~grmorton/dmd.htm