I know they exist, too. Its just that none from the 19th century when they
flooded the plains by the millions do.
>>>And this raises a major frustration I have about the issue of
> creation/evolution. Well meaning honest people like you, wanting to deal
> with the problem of evolution, read books written by people who never did
> sufficient research to ensure that their facts were correct. Then you
trust
> them, because you think they have done the work they should have done.
<<<
I run into the same problem with evolutionists. They make pronouncements
assuming evolution to be true when it isn't. The people you are quoting
are very intricately detailed in their observations but those are just
that, not experiments that have been scientifically verified and
repeatable. Darwinian evolution is considered by many to be just a fact,
not a philosophy, and that is just not true. The overall picture that is
presented today of lack of fossil 'mising links', is just one example. An
evolutionist will scramble mightly for that one possible exception to the
rule, and those seem to be the people you rely on for information. You, by
the way, as well as I, MUST use the information gleaned from reading.
There is no way possible for anyone to look over all the experiments done
in the world.
>>> If you are trying to use this as an explanation within a global flood
model,
> then this won't work. Dinosaurs are more "ambulatory" than we are. They
> could run faster and since they were taller could stick their heads out
of
> the water long after we would be swimming. Yet they occur in the fossil
> record lower than any man.<<<
Yeh, right. They also could not go climbing the mountains to escape the
flood, either.
>
I also know that bison fossils exist. Its just that they don't from the
19th century.
Trust in the LORD with all your heart,
and do not rely on your own insight.. Pr. 3:5
Ron Chitwood
chitw@flash.net
----------
>