>
>Why do you act surprised that Pauls' writings were directed at Christians?
>
Because I am sometimes very slow about such things. I had always seen this
used against evolutionists and hadn't really looked at it in a different light.
>The doctrine Paul is talking about isn't scientific doctrine (Scriptures
>do mention against following the teachings of the 'so called science') but
>philosophical and theological doctrines. In that day there were plenty of
>them. One example of Pauls' rebuke of one of them can be found in the
>whole epistle to the church in Galatia. He also wrote and spoke against
>stoicism, gnosticism and epicureanism to name a few.
>On the other hand, I'm still waiting for evolutionists to come up with
>proof and proved hipothesis of where the vegetable and animal worlds come
>together. If life began in water, then when the blue-green algae became
>sardines and sardines becames apes and so on and why apes aren't turning
>into men today.
>
>I read about evolution just to keep informed as to the lasts twists of it,
>since it seems to change as the seasons. But from there to believe it is
>a long way..
Let me ask this. Have you read Kitchner's Abusing Science or Ruse's Is it
Science or some other book which argues directly against young-earth
creationism and antievolutionism?
regards,
glenn
Adam, Apes, and Anthropology: Finding the Soul of Fossil Man
and
Foundation, Fall and Flood
http://www.isource.net/~grmorton/dmd.htm