Yes, but no causation was provided. That was what Pim was pointing
out.
>Correlation is probabilistic evidence. Jim
>cites other probabilistic evidence.
Not really. He just pointed out a few other apparent correlations
without any clear causative proof.
_____________________________________________________________
| Russell Stewart |
| http://www.rt66.com/diamond/ |
|_____________________________________________________________|
| Albuquerque, New Mexico | diamond@rt66.com |
|_____________________________|_______________________________|
2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2.