Re: Evidence for the existence of God (was ICR and its slurs)

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Mon, 16 Jun 1997 21:28:15 -0400

On Tue, 03 Jun 1997 08:50:20 -0600, Russell Stewart wrote:
SJ>What "evidence" would you accept?

RS>What do you have?

SJ: Russell, *you* are the one claiming that "there is not one shred of
evidence to prove (logically and scientifically) that God exists."

Indeed, so he is undoubtably interested in your 'evidence'.

SJ: For this statement to be meaningful, you must have some idea what you
would accept as evidence . Until you state what it is, it is a waste
of time me posting what I think you would accept as evidence! No
matter what I posted, you could always say that you don't accept it
as evdience.

So perhaps Russell was correct and there is no evidence ? You are
unwilling to show evidence and require Russell to describe what he
believes does not exist ?

Regards

Pim