RS>What do you have?
SJ: Russell, *you* are the one claiming that "there is not one shred of
evidence to prove (logically and scientifically) that God exists."
Indeed, so he is undoubtably interested in your 'evidence'.
SJ: For this statement to be meaningful, you must have some idea what you
would accept as evidence . Until you state what it is, it is a waste
of time me posting what I think you would accept as evidence! No
matter what I posted, you could always say that you don't accept it
as evdience.
So perhaps Russell was correct and there is no evidence ? You are
unwilling to show evidence and require Russell to describe what he
believes does not exist ?
Regards
Pim