Re: references to the journals and books showing that evolution

john queen (john.queen.ii@mail.utexas.edu)
Thu, 12 Jun 1997 11:52:50 -0600

>Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 11:39:45 -0600
>To: "Pim van Meurs" <entheta@eskimo.com>
>From: john queen <john.queen.ii@mail.utexas.edu>
>Subject: Re: references to the journals and books showing that evolution
>has not occured
>Cc:
>Bcc:
>X-Attachments:
>
>----How many times do I have to spell it out? Reguardless of external
>pressures each generation is succeptible to RANDOM GENETIC MUTATIONS.
>Each time the DNA is copied each base pair can be mutated. If your going
>to play russian roulette you have to keep playing it. The body doesn't
>sense that something usefull is starting to be created! It's totally
>random reguardless. Going another generation just exposes the genetic
>code to another round of random genetic mutations! The logic goes more
>easily towards random since it is a RANDOM PROCESS.
> I really do think you need to visit a biochemistry textbook. Don't
>tell me you think the moth example has anything to do with mutations,
>welcome to the 90's. This is so obvious I will let it be.
>
> ` john w queen ii
>
>my comments about welcome to the 90's was not called for: I apologize for
>making them and was wrong in doing so. Ive sent alot of messages today
>and got caught up in the momment. I truely hope your having a good day. jq