Re: No logic.. only Foolishness.

Russell Stewart (diamond@rt66.com)
Thu, 05 Jun 1997 13:40:21 -0600

At 06:34 PM 6/4/97 EDT, you wrote:
>Bill Hamilton writes:
>
><<My point was that, without even considering what alternatives might exist,
>the fact that people from all walks of life have believed in Him over 2000
>years is difficult to dismiss. He might be able to fool some people, but
>the spectrum of people you would have to label as fooled, deluded, etc. is
>so braod, you'd be indicting essentially all of humanity. Mass delusion
>over 2000 years seems absurd to me.>>
>
>This is an excellent point, and applies with greatest force to the rise of
>Christianity itself. It strains credulity to the breaking point to think that
>Christ's followers would go to death for him if he had not risen from the
>dead. Perhaps one could have lost it and gone to his death for a lie; but all
>of them? Hardly.

Then you have a strange definition of "credulity", and certainly a naive view
of human nature. Consider: millions of people throughout history have given
their life for one religious belief or another. Whether for Hinduism,
Christianity,
Judaism, Buddhism, Islam, Native American beliefs, etc., people have
believed so strongly
that they were willing to suffer death and even extreme torture to uphold their
beliefs. Now, by your logic, since all of these people so fanatically
believed in
their religion, then all of them must be entirely true.

Is that possible? Is it possible for every human religion to be the literal
truth?

>And what else but the conviction born of direct experience could have kept
>them all preaching in the face of opposition from their own religious leaders
>and the might of Imperial Rome?
>
>All one need do is apply reason to the real world and the case becomes
>overwhelming.
>
>Jim
>
>
_____________________________________________________________
| Russell Stewart |
| http://www.rt66.com/diamond/ |
|_____________________________________________________________|
| Albuquerque, New Mexico | diamond@rt66.com |
|_____________________________|_______________________________|

2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2.