<<I NEVER CLAIMED THAT MY SYSTEM CAN LOGICALLY SUPPORT OBJECTIVE
MORALITY!!!!!!
How many times do I have to say that to you?
The trouble is, neither can yours! I have asked you dozens of times now to
prove to me that your system is logically objective. You have ignored this
request every time. Why is that? If you are incapable of answering my
question, can't you at least have the intellectual honesty to admit it?>>
Attaching my own megaphone:
I HAVE ANSWERED YOU NUMEROUS TIMES, AND SO HAVE A DOZEN OTHER PEOPLE WHO SEE
WHAT YOU APPARENTLY CANNOT!!!!!!
Ouch, my throat hurts.
Softly, but persuasively, now: Everyone who has participated in this
discussion has seen the distinction but you, Russell. I don't think it's a
matter of intellectual honesty with you, but what is it, then? Could it be a
dog snarl? You know what I mean. When a dog is cornered, obviously surrounded,
no way out, he snarls. That's all he has left.
Your snarl is "Prove to me Christianity is true." That does not answer the
questions about internal consistency. You're still in that corner.
Jim