<<You're right. Behe has published no testable studies in the journals.
Therefore, by your standards, his argument is irrelevant.>>
Jim: Never play lawyer with a lawyer, Russ. Anyway, I don't think we're
getting
anywhere, so let's leave it at that. We made the attempt.
So at least we are getting somewhere then.
<<I must have missed [Behe's] letter. Do you still have a copy of it?>>
Jim: It was posted to talk.origins. Try looking for it in their archives.
Hmm, I'll search again then. Have you looked at Robison's webpage ?