Re: Behe, Dennett, Haig debate at Notre Dame 1/2

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Fri, 02 May 1997 19:48:58 -0400

At 11:35 AM 5/2/97 EDT, you wrote:
>Pim writes:
>
><<Jim:I guess I missed something. Where was this shown? To what
>journals/articles/books are you referring?
>
>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/behe.html>>
>
>I'm sorry, Pim, but talk.origins does not constitute a legitimate,
objective,
>credible or refereed forum for "showing" much of anything.

Russel: So your brand of science cares more about where something was
published
than what it says.

Russel: Interesting.

That's what I thought. My guess is that the piece on talk.origins did have
some relevance and this is an attempt to ignore the data.