You asked "who said it, the dean or Phil Johnson?"
It was Phil. Sorry for not making that clear.
You commented on Schafersman a lot. You really need to read his paper. He
writes well and, whether one agrees with him or not, is interesting.
Criticisms of him from what I write are not likely to be on target.
On the question (theists ought not be scientists on moral grounds) that he
makes, he specifically says it is a moral question -- but not an ethical
one; he does not accuse theistic scientists of acting in bad faith. Rather,
he describes it as a sort of "lack of courage."
I had seen your description of Schafersman by Gish before, of course. The
person Gish described did not fit the appearance or conduct of the person I
encountered. Yes, they are the same person.
You probably asked me another question or two in the last evolution-digest
I received; apologies for missing any others. For me, specifically, it
helps if you add me to the copy list when you ask me somehing on the
reflector.
Burgy