Q: I have a question for Phil Johnson which others on the list have also
asked:
How can you categorically rule out the possibility of theistic
evolution, i.e. the idea that God can direct outcomes non-mechanically in
accordance with His will, but in a way that looks like random evolution to
us?
This was Phil's answer:
"I don't "categorically rule out" anything; it's the scientific
materialists who do that, by insisting that science is by definition
committed to materialism or naturalism. I've explained this repeatedly in
two books and in numerous articles, which are available at:
http://www.arn.org/arn"
Burgy