> What are we to make of all this explosive, recent and utterly
>different kind of art? Where you have shaman art, you have fully modern homo
>divinus, the spiritual man. But there is NO evidence, anywhere, before modern
>man, of what is called the "shamanistic complex":
>
>"Shamanism is as old as fully modern man himself; almost everywhere evidence
>of one is found there is evidence for the other. all the elements of the
>shamanic complex are present in Cro-Magnon man's legacy of art and
>artifcacts." [Goodman, 234]
According you you shaman art appears at 33,000 years but modern man appears
at 120,000 years ago. Maybe shaman art isn't as old as modern man.
and
> How to explain this explosion? Special creation. Any other view either
>skews the physical evidence, or skews the Bible, or both. I'm not willing to
>do either.
So Jim,
You haven't answered my question about whether the homo sapiens on earth
120,000 years ago were human or not; were spiritual or not. This is a
simple question. Is it that difficult to give a straight out yes or no?
glenn
Foundation, Fall and Flood
http://www.isource.net/~grmorton/dmd.htm