> My position is well stated by Russ Matmaan, who wrote recently:
>
> <<Really, I am suggesting only two things: (1)
> Show that Behe's examples are wrong--do this so that a refereed journal
> will accept it, or, failing this, (2) admit that evolution-from-something
> -simpler cannot be assumed in other cases unless a reasonable
> gradualistic path has been presented. Is that so radical?>>
>
> Russ is more judicious than I. I write a little more spiritedly.
It's great to hear a lawyer call me more judicious than he!
Russell Maatman
e-mail: rmaat@mtcnet.net