Re: Irreducible complexity analogs

Randy Landrum (randyl@efn.org)
Fri, 29 Nov 1996 11:47:00 -0800 (PST)

On 28 Nov 1996, Jim Bell wrote:

> Bill Hamilton writes:
>
> <<Hmm, you're missing the point. Yes, the product was designed. Prototypes
> were produced and tested (although some of the test methodology was
> laughable). But the _process_ which led from drawings and prototypes to
> production machines on the loading dock was the result of trial and error..>>
>
> But Bill, trial and error is the very definition of intelligent design.
> Intelligence guides the process of choosing what trial to try; it then
> distinguishes error, and tries again.
>

I believe Gods Trial would be giving intelligent design capabilities to
the product namely man. The error as you would call is was allowing the
product the capabilities to sin. Giving free choice to man was the trial
but I am not so sure it was error.

-Randy