Re: The language of "punctuated naturalism"

Jim Bell (70672.1241@compuserve.com)
18 Sep 96 21:04:31 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Glenn Morton: "Re: supernatural observation & faith def."
Previous message: lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU: "Re: The language of "punctuated naturalism""
Maybe in reply to: pdd@gcc.cc.md.us: "The language of "punctuated naturalism""
Next in thread: pdd@gcc.cc.md.us: "Re: The language of "punctuated naturalism""

Paul Durham wrote:

<<Johnson is an attorney. His method of argument and use of language is
that of an attorney and evidence based.>>

Which is, of course, to say that everything a lawyer says is true.

Right?

Jim

Next message: Glenn Morton: "Re: supernatural observation & faith def."
Previous message: lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU: "Re: The language of "punctuated naturalism""
Maybe in reply to: pdd@gcc.cc.md.us: "The language of "punctuated naturalism""
Next in thread: pdd@gcc.cc.md.us: "Re: The language of "punctuated naturalism""