>WH>I heard this view a number of years ago from a man who taught a seminar in
>WH>our church. The seminar had nothing to do with origins, (it was on
>WH>Scriptural guidance for family living or the like) and this man seemed to
>WH>be quite orthodox in his theology.
>
Paul wrote
>This would mean that God prophesied in the past tense. But that would
>not make it a prophecy, would it? It would be an historical account.
>Perhaps you mean Genesis 1 includes an account of proclamation +
>prophecy + fulfillment?
>
I have two comments:
1. My understanding of prophecy is that it is a declaration of the Lord's
will for an individual or group. Revelations of future events may be
included but need not be.
2. I don't see why Genesis must be treated as prophecy anyway. It's an
outline of the history of the universe.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William E. Hamilton, Jr., Ph.D.
1346 W. Fairview Lane
Rochester, MI 48306
(810) 652 4148