>
>Tom Moore asked:
>
><<This brings up a question I've always wondered, what is incompatible with
>"intelligent design?">>
>
>That would be "random, purposeless design," wouldn't it?
>
>Jim
Jim,
I think Tom was asking what fact would be incompatible with intelligent
design, not what theory[e.g., random, purposeless design] was incompatible
with intelligent design. I would imagine a theory of absolutely no design,
utter chaos, would also be incompatible as would the theory that we are not
here at all but merely an illusion.
glenn
Foundation,Fall and Flood
http://members.gnn.com/GRMorton/dmd.htm