Re: Atheistic Science Teaching:TE is an oxymoron

Glenn Morton (GRMorton@gnn.com)
Wed, 31 Jul 1996 20:25:33

Neal K. Roys wrote:

>So if you're in the TE camp, please consider rejecting TE on the basis
>that it refutes itself. Or at least wait to affirm TE until after you
>aquire cultural authority and use it to change the meaning of the word
> evolution.

Welcome to the reflector.

I agree whole heartedly with you about the purported statement. It should
be condemned. But you can't condemn the innocent because of the guilty.
No one is responsible for what someone else believes. Would you cease
going to church because some church members are racist? Because some
Pastors have committed adultry? We had a preacher here in town who became
known as the friendly rapist! Would you cease being a christian because
of this fellow?

If we allow other people's beliefs and inconsistencies to determine what
we believe we will believe nothing.

Better yet, Henry Morris claims that no where on the surface of the earth
does the geological column exist.

"It has long been recognized that the geologic column is an arbitrary
construct, existing nowhere in full in any local column."H. Morris "The
Geologic Column and the Flood of Genesis" Creation Research Soc. Qtr. June
1996 p. 50

If you will look on my web page you will see an essay on the entire
geological column. It exists in North Dakota and 23 other basins.

WILL YOU QUIT BEING A CREATIOIST AS LONG AS THIS INACCURACY CONTINUES TO
BE PROPAGATED?

Look at my web page on this issue. The question each of us must answer
is:Have we personally been as honest as we can be with the evidence we
have been shown?

glenn
Foundation,Fall and Flood
http://members.gnn.com/GRMorton/dmd.htm