jbt
At 02:40 PM 5/10/96 -0400, lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU wrote:
>Bill Hamilton said it well:
>> I see no reason for keeping philosophical arguments out of the science
>> curriculum, and many for including them. However, philosophy should be
>> clearly labelled as philosophy. I would go so far as to say that I'd favor
>> requiring all degree candidates in science fields to take a sequence of
>> courses in philosophy of science.
>
>I completely agree.
>
>I would very much like to see some philosophy of science taught in the
>high schools, perhaps a week or three of it in the upper level science
>classes. (That means SOMEONE should write a good, short, high-school
>level textbook. Say, Del....)
*******************************************************************
* John B. Tant http://wwwp.exis.net/~jtant jtant@exis.net *
* *
* Alan Keyes for President `96! *
* http://sandh.com/keyes/index.html *
* *
* The opinions I express are my own, not my employer's *
* http://pages.prodigy.com/VA/n4xan/stonebridge.html *
*******************************************************************