On Wed, 8 May 1996, Stephen Jones wrote:
> Group
>
> (Denis-This is a public message. I am unsubscribed from the Reflector
> to catch up. If you reply via the Reflector, please cc. it to me.
> Thanks -SJ).
>
> On Wed, 24 Apr 1996 08:34:19 -0600 (MDT) Denis wrote:
>
> SJ>Denis' response is to claim there is "evidence" *for* evolution,
> >but Art (and Kerkut's) question was, for evolutionists to try to
> >think of evidences *against* evolution. Denis' failure (to date) to
> >post evidence *against* evolution, simply confirms the profound truth
> >behind Kerkut's dialogue between the professor and his student:
>
> >DL>If this is indeed the case, does it mean that "[Stephen]'s failure
> >(to date) to post evidences *against*" Denis' charge that Stephen
> >hacked Darwin quotes from the 'Origin of Species' "simply confirm
> >the profound truth" that Stephen didn't know what he was talking
> >about?
>
> I note that Denis does not support his claim with counter-evidence,
> but just blusters.
>
> In any event, according to Denis I am an unqualified "amateur" who
> doesn't even have a valid point of view. Therefore it is pointless
> and a waste of time me even trying to debating Denis until he retracts
> that fundamental obstacle to meaningful dialogue between us.
>
> Nevertheless, Art did ask for evolutionists to post their arguments
> against evolution. That they (including Denis) failed to do so,
> confirms Kerkut's (and Art's) point.
>
> God bless.
>
> Steve
>
>
>
Stephen,
Deal with the Darwin quotes, and quit whining like a dying horse.
Denis