Probability (Was Re: Ken Ham (help))

John W. Burgeson (73531.1501@compuserve.com)
19 Feb 96 18:40:14 EST

Glenn: I read with great interest your post on this (snipped copy
attached). Although a little mathematical, I think I can follow it
fairly well. At least I perceive no obvious holes in it.

It makes a good point -- can I repost it on Compuserve?

Thanks,, Burgy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
FROM: INTERNET:GRMorton@aol.com, INTERNET:GRMorton@aol.com
TO: ASA Reflector, INTERNET:ASA@CALVIN.EDU
DATE: 2/18/96 4:42 PM

Re: Probability (Was Re: Ken Ham (help))

snip ....

I always get myself in trouble when I post here, but I could not let the
probability issue pass by unchallenged.

Snip...

These are two very different
approaches. But if the probability argument against evolution is
as weak as I showed above, Christianity had best find a better
way to handle the area of Science and the Bible.