> I have repeatedly
> said that the "Two Adam model" is just a shorthand. The full term I
> use is "Gn 1 man - Gn 2 Adam model". I repeat, there was only ONE
> Adam, the individual called "Adam" in Gn 2!
> I have defended the view that Gn 1 man corresponds to the genus Homo
> (all other living things in Gn 1 are "kinds", ie. categories, not
> individuals), whereas Gn 2 Adam is an *individual*.
I have a question for you. Perhaps you explained this in
an earlier presentation, but how is your model consistent with
Genesis 3:20
Now the man called his wife's name Eve,
because she was the mother of all {the} living.
Thanks.
--Dave