I found that argument unsatisfactory. How could a scientist treat
a miracle? If it was repeatable, would it not simply become part of the
natural order of things? If not, would it not simply become an anomoly!
If we were immortal, and death came only by catastropic accidents, so that
only one person ever actually died every -- say -- 1000 years, and if birth
were likewise rare, how would "science" treat the birth event?
Phil's lecture was very well attended -- people sitting on the floor
around & behind him & listening from the doorway. Maybe 400 there
(uneducated guess). He is on a whirlwind speaking tour, as most of you already
know.
John W. Burgeson (Burgy)