Re: Fossil Man Again

GRMorton@aol.com
Thu, 28 Sep 1995 23:22:18 -0400

I wrote:
GM>You have already set up that conflict by ignoring the
anthropological data and insisting on a recent creation of Adam.<<

Stephen replied:
>>No. The two-Adam model fits both sets of data nicely.<<

Ok. Please outline your views. You did once say that you thought
Neanderthals might be human but if you have decided to reject them, tell me
your views about the flood, the creation timing etc and support it with data.

In another post Stephen wrote:
>>It can't be any longer than 125,000 years because according
to the Hominid FAQ, "Neandertal man existed between 125,000
and 35,000 years ago".<<

Not true. the FAQ needs updating (and I hate to go against Jim Foley in his
area of strength--[ I just saw Jim's post on this. Here is a reference] ).
According to Christopher Stringer and Clive Gamble, _In Search of the
Neanderthals_ (Thames and Hudson, 1993), p. 47, and 66 the earliest
Neanderthals came from Ehringsdorf Germany, dated by uranium series and
electron spin resonance at 230,000 years.

glenn