<<In our opinion, the explanatory scope of macroevolution is broad enough,
the nonconforming evidence is not yet serious enough, the potential for
future resolution of that data seems great enough, and the
supernaturalistic hypothesis has sufficient weaknesses, that searching for
naturalistic mechanisms seems the best option.>>
I like the way you put this, because it goes to the heart of the
matter--interpretation of the data, and ends up with "seems" the best option.
We can go on from there.
My view is the mirror image of yours.
Jim