<<Jim, I didn't even mention common ancestry in my post. I talked about
cultural data, fire, walls, etc. What does that have to do with common
ancestry? I would loan you my reading glasses but you are a little distant.>>
And then later says:
<<It really is frustrating when I say things over and over and people don't
see it. In the August archives somewhere around the 10th of the month, are
two posts entitled New view. pt 1 and pt 2...
What's more frustrating is that you first argue I can't consider other things
you've said in drafting an answer...then demand that I go back and read what
you've said previously! C'mon, Glenn, which way do you want it?
Put that aside for now. The main point is I can't distinguish your position
from that of the atheistic Naturalist. Further, you ignore obvious problems
[I didn't notice any substantive argument in your post to the points made],
and I do think you let your inner war with Whitcomb and Morris color your
judgments.
You can call your position "interventionist," but this won't be convincing the
hypothetical student in your class. He will come out confused, and I believe
further from the truth.
Jim