> You respond by accusing me of insisting that the first
creature of every species be fossilized. I don't get it. My point
is not that the first creature of every species must be fossilized
but that the order B/A provides no evidence for an order A/B.
Since the evolutionist is claiming the B arose from A by natural
descent, he must have evidence to demonstrate that B preceded A in
time if he hopes to persuade the skeptic. <
I mistakenly reversed the B and A in the first clause of the
last sentence. I hope that this did not cause any confusion.
Ashby