Ediacaran Fauna and flora
AChadwick (chadwicka@swac.edu)
Mon, 26 Jun 1995 22:48:06 -6000Glenn:
> Denton does mention the ediacaran forms on page 161-162 but then on page 163
> states, "Again, just as in the case of the absence of pre-Cambrian fossils,
> no forms have ever been found in the pre-Cretaceous rocks linking the
> angiosperms with any other group of plants." p. 163. The first phrase of
> this statement is erroneous.
Well, since he associates the two cases with the "just..."clause, and
since no forms have been found in the Ediacaran that link with any of
the Cambrian forms, maybe we should let him by with it???
Art
> End of returned message
>
>
Art