Dave:
> Keith,
> Your "continuous creation" sounds to me more like Hugh Ross's
> position than yours. I recognize that Providence is often connected
> to Creator, but in the current situation creation seems almost
> always to suggest divine initiation of new forms. If you don't like
> TE, Denis's "evolutionary creationism," with its specific reference
> to evolution, seems to derail the usual assumptions with the use of
> "creationism."
"Continuous creation" is not my term, but a theological term that has
been around for awhile (I don't know its full history). It captures
my firm theological position that ALL of creation is sustained and
upheld by God' s continuous personal participation in it. Such a
view does not require any causal gaps in our scientific description
of natural processes. But it also makes not specific claims about
what those processes are -- that is the role of scientific exploration.
Keith
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Jan 24 14:57:15 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 24 2009 - 14:57:16 EST