RE: [asa] Darwin only biological evolution? (can anything exist without evolution?)

Moorad said:
"In what sense is the death of a living being said to have evolved? Do we have to invoke an afterlife?"

I don't understand what you are asking. Can you state your question with more explanation so I can attempt to answer?

...Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexanian, Moorad [mailto:alexanian@uncw.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 1:29 PM
To: Dehler, Bernie; asa@calvin.edu
Subject: RE: [asa] Darwin only biological evolution? (can anything exist without evolution?)

I think the term "evolve" may say or assume more than our knowledge that all that exists is embedded in spacetime. Therefore, there is time-development in general but evolving means much more than that mere fact. In what sense is the death of a living being said to have evolved? Do we have to invoke an afterlife?

Moorad

________________________________
From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On Behalf Of Dehler, Bernie [bernie.dehler@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 11:32 AM
To: asa@calvin.edu
Subject: RE: [asa] Darwin only biological evolution? (can anything exist without evolution?)

Gregory said:
"Once one asks questions such as 'when is something not a mimic?' or 'what are examples of things that don't evolve?' they will see the limitations and boundaries of the concept/percept in question."

I don't think there are any examples what-so-ever of anything that has not evolved. If you can think of just one, give an example, and I think I can explain to you how it evolved.

...Bernie

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Jan 13 13:38:05 2009