Yes, Museum of Modern Art. Sorry for the confusion, I'm too used to that
shorthand.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Jim Armstrong <jarmstro@qwest.net> wrote:
> Presumeably New York's Museum of Modern Art? - JimA
>
> Merv Bitikofer wrote:
>
>> I recognize NOMA (from Gould) but is anyone willing to unpack 'MOMA' for
>> me?
>>
>> --Merv
>> (with apologies if this was hashed out earlier in this thread somewhere.
>> --in which case just refer me back.)
>>
>> Schwarzwald wrote:
>>
>>> Heya Jim,
>>>
>>> The problem I see here is that ID proponents are primarily concerned (or
>>> so they say) with justifying the inference of design. Questions of 'final'
>>> or 'desired' assemblage configuration are not absolutely necessary in that
>>> case - one doesn't necessarily need to know a piece of art is finished in
>>> order to infer that it's a designed product. (I suppose the MOMA would be of
>>> use here.)
>>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
>> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>>
>>
>>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Jan 11 15:30:17 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jan 11 2009 - 15:30:17 EST