Reductionist and tremendously oversimplified, but that's par for the course.
Confusing a subjective experience that is possibly similar or identical to
an subjective experience associated with love - and they have yet to really
come close to even this stage - with love itself. Worse, it helps confuse an
already vague concept.
I'm reminded of a Sam Kinison quote, which - niced up for the list - goes
along the lines of, "I believe you shouldn't have sex unless you're in love.
Now, it can be for a really short amount of time..."
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Christine Smith <
christine_mb_smith@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thought this might be of interest to the list...sounds pretty reductionist
> at first glance...
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7815095.stm
>
> In Christ,
> Christine
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Jan 10 16:09:22 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 10 2009 - 16:09:22 EST