RE: [asa] scientism question

From: Jon Tandy <tandyland@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu Jan 08 2009 - 13:54:04 EST

"Science is the only reality" (actually, since science is basically a field
of study, this should be more correctly represented as "Nature is the only
reality") - either this is a self-evident fact, or it is a belief, or it's a
reasonable deduction that can be derived from facts. So how does he prove
that this assertion isn't a belief? Unless he knows all things about
everything, he has no way to conclusively rule out the existence of anything
non-natural.

 

Is matter eternal, or is it created? If it's eternal, what evidence can he
give to prove (without resorting to a belief system) that matter has always
existed?

 

Jon Tandy

 

From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On
Behalf Of Dehler, Bernie
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 12:15 PM
To: asa@calvin.edu
Subject: [asa] scientism question

 

A questions about the 'scientism' worldview (science is the only reality).
(I'm dealing with an atheist like that.)

 

If a person says they accept only 'science,' should they have a logical
issue with evolution since there is no scientific understanding of how
biological life can arise from non-life? Seems like abiogenesis is a
'belief' based on the evidence indicated by science in general, yet the
atheist I'm dealing with claims to have "no beliefs of any kind."

 

 

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Jan 8 13:54:40 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 08 2009 - 13:54:40 EST