Re: [asa] ID without specifying the intelligence?

From: Carol or John Burgeson <burgytwo@juno.com>
Date: Sat Sep 15 2007 - 12:47:17 EDT

Jim asked: "But would that not be true of any living sentient creature?
The higher the order, probably the more unpredictable?"

Possibly. I don't know or even have an opinion. Perhaps my lab is just a
"meat machine." But I am not.

Pim commented:

"Is that what defines supernatural? Unpredictable?"

I don't think I made that claim. Unpredictability is an outcome of having
free will. It is not, I think, a definition if it.

"And yet much of the commercial world depends on the predictability of
humans."

True. But so what? Much of what I do is sort of subconscious -- I think
the will gets involved only when decisions are made. That may be, in the
case of some people, fairly rarely. <G>

"Are humans not even in principle predictable?"

To a large extent, yes. But not when they exercise their free will to
make a conscious decision. Statistically, perhaps. Not singly.

Burgy

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Sep 15 12:51:09 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 15 2007 - 12:51:09 EDT