Romans 1:20 says we can learn about God by studying creation.
Why would a non functional bit of DNA that said something in English be convincing? Because of the improbability of it. DNA is not in English - we see it's complexity in the products it codes for.
I did calculations in the late 70's that are still basically sound. I have refined them but still can't get around that seem to ELIMINATE random mutations are the origin of the information content of DNA - I'm not trying to trick anyone - unless I was tricking myself. I was perfectly willing to go with some form of Theistic evolution (and still am). I see no conflict with the Bible, rightly interpreted.
Paul
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Sep 14 11:25:09 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 14 2007 - 11:25:09 EDT