THen explain to me what you believe science should be that it would
include a vacuous concept like ID to be called 'scientific'?
What has ID contributed to our knowledge?
On 9/13/07, Peter Loose <peterwloose@compuserve.com> wrote:
>
> PvM says
>
> <Why is ID not science ?>
>
>
> I see the response as interesting but not immediately relevant.
>
> Why?
>
> Until there is clarity on:
>
> What is Science?
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Sep 13 11:02:41 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 13 2007 - 11:02:41 EDT